Sunday, October 31, 2010
Data Protection Review
Seems the Data Protection Directive will be looked at again, especially on cookies and transfer of data outside EU. Can't help but think it will take 4 years plus to sort out - by that time technology, business processes and people behaviour will move on - and new laws will be out of date.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Computer says "no", but maybe we still say "yes" far too much!
I'm surprised that the government's National Security Strategy has just identified cyber-terrorism as a major threat to the United Kingdom. Industry knew this years ago - and so did government!
Back in 2000 we had a rafter of snooping laws to deal with online (and offline) terrorism and serious crime - as well as to allow nosey busy-bodies the ability to snoop on the contents of your dustbin.
But, it's easy for us to blame the technology, government or corporate irresponsibility for everything that is wrong with the Internet. It's now time for each and every one of us to take some responsbility towards managing our cyber lives.
The Internet is no longer the domain of techies. We're all now better educated about the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats from cyber space. We still do have choices about the information we give out and the actions that we take online. As we continue to invest in next generation broadband and strive to keep the UK globally competitive online, let's also ensure that our workers and citizens have the know-how skills to keep 'cyber-savy'.
Of course, we must still protect children and the vulnerable when they are online, but technology is not always the answer. For example, and speaking as a former prosecutor that specialised in paedophile cases, society can only control the behaviour of sex offenders in most cases, not cure them. Control is achieved by effective supervision and investment in the criminal justice system.
The recent criticism of Facebook over the murder of Ashleigh Hall does not help the debate. Yes, the circumstances were awful and I have every sympathy for her family. However, she chose to meet her killer which was beyond the reach of online technology. What happened to Ashleigh in these specific circumstances only became obvious after the event. Organisations are not judge and jury, but they do have a responsibility to work with criminal justice agencies to reduce the online risks from criminals (and terrorists).
So let's learn from what we now know. Taking personal responsibility for our cyber lives should be the starting point for building a more secure online environment that allows us to enjoy the personal freedoms and opportunities that we have come to expect from the electronic economy.
Back in 2000 we had a rafter of snooping laws to deal with online (and offline) terrorism and serious crime - as well as to allow nosey busy-bodies the ability to snoop on the contents of your dustbin.
But, it's easy for us to blame the technology, government or corporate irresponsibility for everything that is wrong with the Internet. It's now time for each and every one of us to take some responsbility towards managing our cyber lives.
The Internet is no longer the domain of techies. We're all now better educated about the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats from cyber space. We still do have choices about the information we give out and the actions that we take online. As we continue to invest in next generation broadband and strive to keep the UK globally competitive online, let's also ensure that our workers and citizens have the know-how skills to keep 'cyber-savy'.
Of course, we must still protect children and the vulnerable when they are online, but technology is not always the answer. For example, and speaking as a former prosecutor that specialised in paedophile cases, society can only control the behaviour of sex offenders in most cases, not cure them. Control is achieved by effective supervision and investment in the criminal justice system.
The recent criticism of Facebook over the murder of Ashleigh Hall does not help the debate. Yes, the circumstances were awful and I have every sympathy for her family. However, she chose to meet her killer which was beyond the reach of online technology. What happened to Ashleigh in these specific circumstances only became obvious after the event. Organisations are not judge and jury, but they do have a responsibility to work with criminal justice agencies to reduce the online risks from criminals (and terrorists).
So let's learn from what we now know. Taking personal responsibility for our cyber lives should be the starting point for building a more secure online environment that allows us to enjoy the personal freedoms and opportunities that we have come to expect from the electronic economy.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
CHECK it out! Safer Online Shopping
5 things you should know in order to keep safe when shopping online
C Choose your site carefully
H Help yourself by thinking about the price, the place you are buying from, and packaging
E Ensure that the site is secure by looking for 'https' and the padlock icon
C Contact law enforcement if you spot something suspicious
K Keep a copy of your order, details of the website, and acknowledgements.
For the latest consumer protection news, visit eradar.eu/consumers
C Choose your site carefully
H Help yourself by thinking about the price, the place you are buying from, and packaging
E Ensure that the site is secure by looking for 'https' and the padlock icon
C Contact law enforcement if you spot something suspicious
K Keep a copy of your order, details of the website, and acknowledgements.
For the latest consumer protection news, visit eradar.eu/consumers
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
No Dying in Parliament!
Although not technically an offence, dying in the precincts of the UK Parliament is apparently not allowed and your body will be removed before a death certificate is issued. Otherwise, you will be entitled to a state funeral since the Palace of Westminster is a royal palace.
Is there a doctor in thehouse palace?
Is there a doctor in the
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
UK Government's National Security Strategy
Why are we all surprised that the new National Security Strategy identifies cyber-terrorism as a major threat to the UK's stability? Doesn't anyone watch the BBC's Spooks? Seriously, we can only image what would happen if terrorists struck our air traffic control systems, HMRC database, or our nuclear defence infrastructure. Thanks goodness that we killed off the introduction of identity cards and saved us time, money and trouble!
Welcome to the new E RADAR blog
We've decided to move E RADAR's blog off the main website in order to make the most of online inter-collaborative tools. You can also find us on LinkedIn and YouTube, and we'll have more to come soon. We're always on the look out for great blogs that help us to help e-businesses deal with the legal and regulatory environment in the UK. For further information, please contact E RADAR's e-business networking team
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)